UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Marchex, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

August 15, 201820, 2020

Dear Stockholders of Marchex, Inc.,

We cordially invite you to attend our 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, September 27, 2018,October 1, 2020, at 10:12:00 AMPM Pacific Time at Marchex, Inc., 520 Pike Street, 1211 Building Conference Center, 12^th floor,Suite 2000, Da Vinci Boardroom, Seattle, Washington.

At this year’s Annual Meeting, the agenda will be as follows:

For our 20182020 Annual Meeting, we have elected to use the Internet as our primary means of providing our proxy materials to stockholders. Consequently, most stockholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. We will instead send to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, which contains, among other things, our 20172019 audited consolidated financial statements. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also includes instructions on how you can vote using the Internet, and how you can request and receive, free of charge, a printed copy of our proxy materials, including our 20172019 Annual Report, the Notice of Annual Meeting, our proxy statement and a proxy card. The electronic delivery of our proxy materials will reduce our printing and mailing costs and minimize the environmental impact of the proxy materials.

The ability to have your vote counted at the Annual Meeting is an important stockholder right. Regardless of the number of shares you hold, and whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope that you will promptly cast your vote.

Thank you for your ongoing support and continued interest in Marchex, Inc.

Marchex, Inc.

520 Pike Street, Suite 2000

Seattle, Washington 98101

NOTICE OF 20182020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held at 10:12:00 a.m.p.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, September 27, 2018October 1, 2020

Dear Stockholders of Marchex, Inc.:

The 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”“Annual Meeting”) of Marchex, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Marchex”Marchex”), will be held on Thursday, September 27, 2018,October 1, 2020, at 10:12:00 AMPM Pacific Time, at Marchex, Inc., 520 Pike Street, 1211 Building Conference Center, 12Suite 2000, Da Vinci Boardroom^th floor,, Seattle, Washington, for the following purposes as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR items 1, 2 and 2.3 and THREE YEARS for item 4. The Board of Directors of Marchex has fixed the close of business on August 2, 201810, 2020 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record on the record date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in the accompanying proxy statement.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote by telephone or Internet by following the voting procedures described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you received printed proxy materials and wish to vote by mail, promptly complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it in the accompanying envelope.

We appreciate your continued support of Marchex.

Seattle, Washington

August 15, 201820, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

PROXY STATEMENT

20182020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

SEPTEMBER 27, 2018OCTOBER 1, 2020

GENERAL INFORMATION

This proxy statement is being provided to solicit proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of Marchex, Inc. for use at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on September 27, 2018,October 1, 2020, at 10:12:00 AMPM Pacific Time, at Marchex, Inc., 520 Pike Street, 1211 Building Conference Center, 12^th Floor,Suite 2000, Da Vinci Boardroom, Seattle, Washington, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. We expect to first make this proxy statement available, together with our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, to stockholders on approximately August 15, 2018.20, 2020.

Our principal offices are located at 520 Pike Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101.

In this proxy statement, we refer to Marchex, Inc. as Marchex, we, us or the Company.

Internet Availability of Annual Meeting Materials

Under rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or the Notice, to our stockholders of record. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or to request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. You will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one in the manner set forth in the Notice. This permits us to conserve natural resources and reduces our printing costs, while giving stockholders a convenient and efficient way to access our proxy materials and vote their shares.

We intend to mail the Notice on or about August 15, 201820, 2020 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Who May Vote

Only holders of record of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock, at the close of business on August 2, 2018 ,10, 2020, or the Record Date, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, 5,056,1364,660,927 shares of Class A common stock and 36,726,85239,896,634 shares of Class B common stock were issued and outstanding. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to twenty-five (25) votes at the Annual Meeting and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to one (1) vote at the Annual Meeting. Holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock will vote together as a single class on all matters that come before the Annual Meeting; accordingly, throughout this proxy statement we refer generally to our outstanding Class A common stock and Class B common stock together as our "Common Stock."Common Stock."

What Constitutes a Quorum

Stockholders may not take action at the Annual Meeting unless there is a quorum present at the meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote as of the close of business on the Record Date constitutes a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will count toward establishing a quorum. Broker non-votes occur when brokers holding shares in street name for beneficial owners do not receive instructions from the beneficial owners about how to vote the shares. An abstention occurs when a stockholder withholds such stockholder's vote by checking the "abstain" box on the proxy card, or similarly elects to abstain via the Internet voting. Under the rules that govern brokers who are voting with respect to shares held in street name, brokers have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters, including the ratification of appointment of independent registered accounting firm.

Vote Required

Proposal One: Under applicable law and our current bylaws, the four (4) director candidates who receive the greatest number of votes cast for the election of directors by shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote shall be elected directors.

Proposal Two: The ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

Proposal Three: The advisory vote on the compensation paid to our named executive officers requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

Proposal Four: The advisory vote on the frequency of the vote on the compensation paid to our named executive officers will be determined by a plurality of the votes cast.

Voting Process

Shares that are properly voted or for which proxy cards are properly executed and returned will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions given or, in the absence of directions, will be voted "FOR" Proposals No. 1, 2 and 2.3 and “Three Years” for Proposal 4.

It is not expected that any other matters will be brought before the Annual Meeting. If, however, other matters are properly presented, the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance with their discretion with respect to such matters.

The manner in which your shares may be voted depends on how your shares are held. If you are the record holder of your shares, meaning you appear as the holder of your shares on the records of our stock transfer agent, you may vote those shares via the Internet, or, if you request a printed copy of the proxy materials, via a proxy card for voting those shares included with the printed proxy materials. If you own shares in street name, meaning you are a beneficial owner with your shares held through a bank or brokerage firm, you may instead receive a voting instruction form with this proxy statement that you may use to instruct your bank or brokerage firm how to vote your shares.

Voting on the Internet

You can vote your shares via the Internet by following the instructions in the Notice. The Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate your identity and to allow you to vote your shares and confirm your voting instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to complete and mail a proxy card. We encourage you to vote your shares via the Internet even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

Voting by Mail

You can vote your shares by mail by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials sent to your address. When you receive the proxy materials, you may fill out the proxy card enclosed therein and return it per the instructions on the card. By signing and returning the proxy card according to the instructions provided, you are enabling the individuals named on the proxy card, known as "proxies," to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you indicate. If you request a printed copy of the proxy materials, we encourage you to sign and return the proxy card even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

Voting by Telephone

You may be able to vote by telephone. If so, instructions are included with your Notice. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to complete and mail your proxy card.

Attendance and Voting at the Annual Meeting

If you are the record holder of your shares, you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. You will be required to present a form of photo identification for admission to the Annual Meeting. If you own your stock in street name, you may attend the Annual Meeting in person provided that you present a form of photo identification and confirmation of ownership, such as a recent brokerage statement or a letter from a bank or broker, but in order to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting you must obtain a "legal proxy" from the bank or brokerage firm that holds your shares. You should contact your bank or brokerage account representative to obtain a legal proxy.

Revocation

If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke a previously granted proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Secretary of Marchex, Inc. a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Any stockholder owning shares in street name may change or revoke previously given voting instructions by contacting the bank or brokerage firm holding the shares or by obtaining a legal proxy from such bank or brokerage firm and voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Your personal attendance at the Annual Meeting does not revoke your proxy. Your last vote, prior to or at the Annual Meeting, is the vote that will be counted.

Householding

The SEC permits companies to send a single Notice, and for those stockholders that elect to receive a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail one copy of this proxy statement, together with our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, to any household at which two or more stockholders reside, unless contrary instructions have been received, but only if we provide advance notice and follow certain procedures. In such cases, each stockholder continues to receive a separate Notice, and for those stockholders that elect to receive a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail, one copy of our fiscal 20172019 Annual Report and this proxy statement. This householding process reduces the volume of duplicate information and reduces printing and mailing expenses.

We have not instituted householding for stockholders of record; however, certain brokerage firms may have instituted householding for beneficial owners of our Common Stock held through brokerage firms. If your family has multiple accounts holding our Common Stock, you may have already received householding notification from your broker. Please contact your broker directly if you have any questions or require additional copies of the Notice, our fiscal 20172019 Annual Report and this proxy statement. The broker will arrange for delivery of a separate copy of the Notice, and, if so requested, a separate copy of these proxy materials promptly upon your written or oral request. You may decide at any time to revoke your decision to household, and thereby receive multiple copies.

Solicitation of Proxies

We pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. We solicit by mail, telephone, personal contact and electronic means and arrangements are made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send Notices, and if requested, other proxy materials, to beneficial owners. Upon request, we will reimburse them for their reasonable expenses. In addition, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies, either personally or by telephone, facsimile or written or electronic mail.  Stockholders are requested to return their proxies without delay.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this proxy statement, including, but not limited to, statements regarding our future operating results, financial position, prospects, acquisitions, dispositions, and business strategy, expectations regarding our growth and the growth of the industry in which we operate, and plans and objectives of management for future operations are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “anticipates”, “believes”, “could”, “estimates”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “seeks” and other similar language, whether in the negative or affirmative, are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in these forward-looking statements are discussed in the “Risk Factors”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” sections in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In addition, the global economic climate and additional or unforeseen effects from the COVID-19 pandemic may amplify many of these risks. We therefore caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. Also, any forward-looking statement made by us in this proxy statement speaks only as of the date of this proxy statement. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

To the Company’s knowledge, the following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock as of August 2, 201810, 2020 by:

Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 5,056,1364,660,927 shares of our Class A common stock and 36,726,85239,896,634 shares of our Class B common stock outstanding as of August 2, 2018.10, 2020. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options or restricted stock units held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable or issuable upon vesting within 60 days of August 2, 2018,10, 2020, are deemed outstanding. These shares are not, however, deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise noted below, the address for each beneficial owner listed below is c/o Marchex, Inc., 520 Pike Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101.

Except as indicated in the footnotes below and except as subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

PROPOSAL ONE—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Item 1 on Proxy Card)

The Board of Directors currently consists of four (4) individuals. Directors are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. The names and the respective ages of the four (4) nominees as of August 2, 201810, 2020 are set forth below:

Set forth below is a description of the business experience of each current director, including a discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board of Directors to conclude that those individuals should serve as our directors.

Dennis Cline. Mr. Cline has served as a member of our Board of Directors since May 2003. Since 2013,Previously, Mr. Cline has served on the board of advisors of Blackstratus, a provider of security information event management products and services. Previously,services from 2014 through 2019. Mr. Cline served on the board of directors of TraceSecurity, a provider of cloud-based security solutions, from 2003 to 2015. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Cline served as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of netForensics, a provider of security event information management. Prior to joining netForensics as its Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Cline was Managing Partner of DMC Investments, a firm he founded in 2000, which provides capital and consulting services to technology companies. From 1988 to 2000, Mr. Cline was the CEO of DirectWeb, a provider of computer hardware and Internet access for consumers. Prior to DirectWeb, Mr. Cline was a senior executive at Network Associates, a provider of computer security solutions. Mr. Cline received his J.D. from Rutgers School of Law and his B.A. from Rutgers University. Mr. Cline brings extensive governance, marketing, sales and broad management expertise to the board.

Anne Devereux-MillsDonald Cogsville. Ms. Devereux-MillsMr. Cogsville has served as a member of our Board of Directors since October 2006 and as Chairman of our Board Directors since October 2016. With over 25 years of experience leading marketing and advertising industries, Ms. Devereux-Mills founded Parlay House in 2012 and continues to lead its roll-out.  With over 4,000 members to date, Parlay House hosts monthly events that inform and inspire women to form connections beyond their natural circles and emphasizes building relationships that pull other women forward.  Prior to these current roles, Ms. Devereux-Mills served as Chairman of LLNS, a division of Omnicom Group Inc. (NYSE: OMC) from May 2006 to April 2012 and served as2019.  Mr. Cogsville is the Chief Executive Officer of LLNS from May 2006 to September 2010. LLNS isThe Cogsville Group, LLC, a leading healthcare communications agency. Prior to joining LLNS, from February 2003 to May 2006, Ms. Devereux-Mills wasNew York-based, private equity real estate investment firm founded in 2007.  Mr. Cogsville began his career as an attorney in the Chief Integration OfficerStructured Finance Group at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Subsequently, Mr. Cogsville joined the Leveraged Finance Group at Merrill Lynch as well as Managing Directoran investment banker.  Additionally, Mr. Cogsville serves or has served on the Board of all health-related assignments within BBDOVisitors of University of North Carolina, The New York an advertising agency. Before joining BBDO New York,Urban League, Jazz at Lincoln Center, The Amsterdam News Editorial Board and founded the non-partisan voter registration initiative, Citizen Change. Mr. Cogsville received his J.D. from April 2002 to February 2003, Ms. Devereux-Mills was PresidentRutgers School of Dugan Valva Contess, an independent communications agency. From January 1996 to April 2002, Ms. Devereux-Mills was PresidentLaw and Founderhis B.A. from University of Consumer Healthworks which then became Merkley Newman Harty Healthworks, one of the first agencies to specialize in direct-to-consumer advertising for healthcare brands. Ms. Devereux-Mills received a B.A. degree from Wellesley College. Ms. Devereux-MillsNorth Carolina at Chapel Hill. Mr. Cogsville brings extensive marketingoperational, finance and advertising expertisetransactional experience to the board.

Russell C. Horowitz. Mr. Horowitz is a founder of our Company and has served as our Executive DirectorChairman since August 2017April 2019 and as our Co-CEO, including previously as a member of the Office of the CEO since October 2016. Previously, Mr. Horowitz served as our Executive Director since August 2017. Immediately prior, Mr. Horowitz, served as a consultant to the Company from May of 2016 through August 2017. Prior to serving as a consultant to the Company, Mr. Horowitz served as Executive Director from February 2015 to May 2016 and as CEO, Treasurer and Chairman of the Board from inception to February 2015. Mr. Horowitz was previously a founder of Go2Net, a provider of online services to merchants and consumers, including merchant Web hosting, online payment authorization technology, and Web search and directory services. He served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from its inception in February 1996 until its merger with InfoSpace in October 2000, at which time Mr. Horowitz served as the Vice Chairman and President of the combined company through the merger integration process. Additionally, Mr. Horowitz served as the Chief Financial Officer of Go2Net from its inception until May 2000. Prior to Go2Net, Mr. Horowitz served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Xanthus Management, LLC, the general partner of Xanthus Capital, a merchant bank focused on investments in early-stage companies, and was a founder and Chief Financial Officer of Active Apparel Group, now Everlast Worldwide. Mr. Horowitz received a B.A. in Economics from Columbia College of Columbia University. Mr. Horowitz brings historic knowledge and continuity together with extensive operational and industry expertise to the board.

M. Wayne Wisehart. Mr. Wisehart has served as a member of our Board of Directors since November 2008. From February 2010 to November 2010, Mr. Wisehart served as Chief Financial Officer for All Star Directories, a publisher of online and career school directories. Mr. Wisehart previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of aQuantive, Inc. (formerly Avenue A Media, Inc.), a leading global digital marketing company, which was acquired by Microsoft in August 2007. Prior to aQuantive, Mr. Wisehart served as Chief Financial Officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a cellular phone service provider, which was acquired by Alltel in August 2005. Mr. Wisehart also served as the Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2002 of iNNERHOST, Inc., a Web hosting service’s company, as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1999 to 2000 of TeleDirect International Inc., a company that provide customer interaction systems, and as the President and Chief Executive Officer from 1997 to 1998 of Price Communications Wireless. Mr. Wisehart also serves on the Board of Directors of Centri Technology, Inc. Mr. Wisehart received a B.S. degree in Business from the University of Missouri-St. Louis. Mr. Wisehart brings extensive financial and accounting expertise to the board.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Independence

The Board of Directors determined that, other than Mr. Horowitz, each of the members of the board is an independent director in accordance with NASDAQ listing standards.

Committees and Meeting Attendance

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. Each of these committees operates under a written charter adopted by the board. Copies of these charters are available on our website at www.marchex.com. The Board of Directors held fivefour meetings and took action by written consent on sixeight occasions during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019. Each of the standing committees of the board held the number of meetings indicated below. During the last fiscal year, each of our directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the board and committees of the board on which such director served during that period. We encourage director representation at our annual meetings of stockholders. Our Chairman attended last year’s annual meeting.

The following table sets forth the three standing committees of the board, the members of each committee, the number of meetings held by each committee, and the number of committee actions taken by written consent during the 20172019 fiscal period:

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Wisehart (Chair), Cogsville and Cline and Ms. Devereux-Mills.Cline. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing standards as they apply to Audit Committee members. Messrs. Clinemembers and Wisehart areeach member of the Audit Committee is an Audit Committee financial experts,expert, as defined in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee operates under a charter that is available on our website at www.marchex.com. The functions of the Audit Committee include reviewing, with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the scope and timing of the independent registered public accounting firm’s services, the independent registered public accounting firm’s report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting following completion of the Company’s audits, and the Company’s internal accounting and financial control policies and procedures, and making annual recommendations to the Board of Directors for the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm for the ensuing year. Additional information regarding the Audit Committee is set forth in the Audit Committee Report below.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Cogsville (Chair), Cline (Chair) and Wisehart and Ms. Devereux-Mills.Wisehart. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing standards. The Compensation Committee operates under a charter that is available on our website at www.marchex.com.

The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in carrying out its responsibilities with respect to: (i) overseeing the Company’s compensation policies and practices; (ii) reviewing and approving annual compensation and compensation procedures for the Company’s executive officers; and (iii) overseeing and recommending director compensation to the Board of Directors. More specifically, the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include overseeing the Company’s general compensation structure, policies and programs, and assessing whether the Company’s compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees; making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to, and administering, the Company’s incentive compensation and equity-based compensation plans, including the Company’s stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan; reviewing and approving compensation procedures for the Company’s executive officers; recommending to the independent directors for approval the compensation of the Company’s executive officers based on relevant corporate goals and objectives and the Board of Directors’ performance evaluation of the Company’s executive officers; reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors employment, retention, restricted stock and severance agreements for executive officers, including change in control provisions, plans or agreements; reviewing the compensation of directors for service on the Board of Directors and its committees. Regarding most compensation matters, including executive and director compensation, the Company’s management

provides recommendations to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has delegated its authority to grant equity and other awards under the Company’s stock incentive plan to eligible employees who are not executive officers to the Stock Option Grant Subcommittee within certain pre-approved limits. The Stock Option Grant Subcommittee currently consists of Messrs.Mr. Arends and CaldwellMs. Paterniti and such committee regularly reports any grants made to the Compensation Committee.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Cline (Chair), Cogsville and Wisehart and Ms. Devereux-Mills.Wisehart. Each of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent for purposes of the NASDAQ listing standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee operates under a charter that is available on our website at www.marchex.com. The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to become board members, recommends to the board those persons to be nominated for election to our board at the annual meeting of stockholders, develops and recommends to the board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company and oversees the annual evaluation of the board.

Nomination of Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee may use third party executive search firms to help identify prospective director nominees. The Nominating and Governance Committee has not established specific minimum age, education, experience, or skill requirements for potential members, but, in general, expects that qualified candidates will have high-level managerial experience in a relatively complex organization or be accustomed to dealing with complex problems, and will be able to represent the interests of the stockholders as a whole rather than special interest groups or constituencies. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers each candidate’s character, integrity, judgment, skills, background, experience of particular relevance to the Company, ability to work well with others and time available to devote to board activities, among other factors. The Nominating and Governance Committee also considers the interplay of a candidate’s background and expertise with that of other board members, and the extent to which a candidate may be a desirable addition to any committee of the board. The Nominating and Governance Committee uses the same process for evaluating all nominees, regardless of the original source of the nomination.

The Nominating and Governance Committee also focuses on issues of diversity, such as diversity of gender, race and national origin, education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. The Nominating and Governance Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria. Rather, the Board of Directors believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the board to fulfill its responsibilities. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that it is essential that the board members represent diverse viewpoints. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s goal is to assemble a board that brings to the Company a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience.

Our evaluations of potential directors include, among other things, an assessment of a candidate’s background and credentials, personal interviews, and discussions with appropriate references. Once we have selected appropriate candidates, we present them to the full board for election if a vacancy occurs or is created by an increase in the size of the board during the course of the year, or for nomination if the director is to be first elected by stockholders.

Marchex stockholders may recommend individuals to the Nominating and Governance Committee for consideration as potential director candidates by submitting their names and appropriate supporting background and biographical information to: Marchex, Inc., 520 Pike Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101, Attention: General Counsel. The recommendation must include any relevant information, including the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data and qualifications, and information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company within the last three years. Acceptance of a recommendation does not mean that the committee will ultimately nominate the recommended candidate.

Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a code of conduct applicable to each of the Company’s officers, directors and employees, and a code of ethics applicable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the Company’s senior financial officers, as contemplated by Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and both codes are available on our website at www.marchex.com.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines to ensure effective corporate governance which are available on our website at www.marchex.com.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board of Directors does not have a specific policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board as the board believes it is in the best interest of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the board. The Board of Directors is responsible for the control and direction of the Company.

The Board of Directors is currently comprised of independent members, as independence is defined under the NASDAQ Listing Standards along with the Executive Director.Chairman. The leadership structure of the Company has varied over time as the demands of the business, the composition of the Board, and the ranks of our senior executives have changed, and the Board has utilized this flexibility to establish the most appropriate structure at any given time. From our inception, until February of 2015, we combined the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. In February of 2015, we began to operate with an Executive Chairman of the Board separate from the Chief Executive Officer. In October 2016, Anne Devereux-Mills was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors and an Office of the CEO was established subject to oversight by Ms. Devereux-Mills following the resignation of our then Chief Executive Officer.

Currently the duties and responsibilities of the chief executive officer are performed by the Office of the CEO consisting ofCo-CEOs Michael Arends (Chief Financial Officer), Ethan Caldwell (Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary), and Russell C. Horowitz (Executive Director)Chairman). We are assessing our current and future senior leadership needs, although we may not be successful in finding or hiring suitable additional senior leadership.

Board’s Role in Risk Management

The Board of Directors, as a whole and also at the committee level, is responsible for oversight of our risk assessment and management process. Management is responsible for the Company’s day-to-day risk management activities. The Audit Committee periodically reviews risks and exposures associated with financial matters and financial reporting, the Compensation Committee oversees risks relating to compensation programs and policies, and the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees risks associated with Board and corporate governance matters. Furthermore, the Board of Directors periodically reviews risk management matters, including as part of its ongoing corporate strategy review, and is apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters.

Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors performs an annual self-assessment to evaluate its effectiveness in fulfilling its obligations.

Executive Session

The corporate governance guidelines provide that the Company’s independent directors shall meet regularly (not less than two times per year) in executive session at which only the Company’s independent directors shall be present. The independent directors met in executive session twofour times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee during 2017,2019, are or have been an officer or employee of the Company. No member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. During fiscal year 2017,2019, none of the Company’s executive officers served on the Compensation Committee (or its equivalent) or Board of Directors of another entity any of whose executive officers served on the Company’s Compensation Committee or Board of Directors.

Communications with Directors

The Board of Directors provides a process for Marchex stockholders to send communications to the Board of Directors. Any stockholder who desires to contact the Board of Directors may do so by writing to: Marchex, Inc., 520 Pike Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101, Attention: Ethan Caldwell,Michelle Paterniti, Secretary. Communications received by mail will be screened by the Secretary for appropriateness before either forwarding to or notifying the members of the Board of Directors of receipt of a communication.

PROPOSAL TWO—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

(Item 2 on Proxy Card)

The Board of Directors has reappointed the firm of Moss Adams LLP (“Moss Adams”Adams”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year. Stockholder ratification of the selection of Moss Adams as Marchex’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required by Marchex’s bylaws, Delaware corporate law or otherwise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors has elected to seek such ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. Should the stockholders fail to ratify the selection of Moss Adams as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Board of Directors will consider whether to retain that firm for the year ending December 31, 20182020 and will consider the appointment of another independent registered public accounting firm. Moss Adams was the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. Representatives of Moss Adams are expected to be present at the annual meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders present at the meeting.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF MOSS ADAMS LLP.

In addition to audit services, KPMG LLP, Marchex’s prior independent registered accounting firm, and Moss Adams also provided certain non-audit services to Marchex in 20162018 and 2017.2019. The terms of Marchex’s engagement with KPMG provide for alternative dispute resolution procedures and exclude the award of punitive damages, and for Moss Adams for alternative dispute resolution procedures.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES

On June 23, 2017, the Audit Committee approved the selection of Moss Adams to serve as Marchex’s independent registered public accounting firm. KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) served as Marchex’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and through June 23, 2017.

Accounting Fees and Services

During fiscal years 20162018 and 2017,2019, KPMG and Moss Adams provided professional services in the following categories and amounts:

The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG and Moss Adams and the Audit Committee has concluded that it is.

The Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the 20162018 and the 20172019 services and fees above pursuant to the pre-approval policy described below.

Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The policy of the Audit Committee is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year. The Audit Committee pre-approves services by authorizing specific projects within the categories outlined above, subject to the budget for each category. The Audit Committee’s charter delegates to its chairman the authority to address any requests for pre-approval of services between Audit Committee meetings, and the chairman must report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically request that it be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

We reviewed Marchex’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 and discussed these financial statements with Marchex’s management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. Marchex’s management is responsible for Marchex’s financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Marchex’s independent registered public accounting firm, Moss Adams LLP (“Moss Adams”Adams”), is responsible for performing an independent audit of Marchex’s financial statements in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”PCAOB”) and issuing a report on those financial statements and issuing a report on the effectiveness of Marchex’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year. Our responsibility is to monitor and review these processes. We also reviewed and discussed with Moss Adams the audited financial statements and the matters required by SEC Regulation S-X Rule 2-07 and Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees.

Moss Adams provided us with the written disclosures and the letter required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence. This rule requires independent registered public accounting firms annually to disclose in writing all relationships that in the independent registered public accounting firm’s professional opinion may reasonably be thought to bear on independence, to confirm their independence and to engage in a discussion of independence. In addition to engaging in this discussion with Moss Adams regarding its independence, we also considered whether Moss Adams’ provision of other, non-audit related services to Marchex is compatible with maintaining Moss Adams’ independence.

Based on our discussions with management and Moss Adams, and our review of information provided by management and Moss Adams, we recommended to the Marchex Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in Marchex’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

Respectfully submitted,

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Dennis Cline

Anne Devereux-MillsDonald Cogsville

M. Wayne Wisehart, Chair

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATING TO OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Executive Officers

Our executive officers, and their respective ages, as of August 2, 2018,10, 2020, are as follows:

Biographical information for Russell C. Horowitz who has been nominated as a director is set forth above (See “Proposal One – Election of Directors”) and biographical information for all other executive officers is set forth below.

Michael Arends. Mr. Arends has served as our Chief Financial Officer since May 2003, and asour Co-CEO, including previously a member of the Office of the CEO since October 2016. Prior to joining Marchex, Mr. Arends held various positions at KPMG since 1992, most recently as a Partner in KPMG’s Pacific Northwest Information, Communications and Entertainment assurance practice. Mr. Arends is a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Accountant and received a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Alberta.

Ethan Caldwell. Mr. Caldwell is a founder of our Company and has served as our Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary since our inception in January 2003 and as a member of the Office of the CEO since October 2016. Mr. Caldwell previously served as our General Counsel from January 2003 through June 2018. Mr. Caldwell was previously Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Go2Net, from November 1996, until its merger with InfoSpace through December 2000. Mr. Caldwell received his J.D. from the University of Maryland and his B.A. in Political Science from Occidental College.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Role of Stockholder Say-On-Pay Votes

In August 2017, we held a stockholder advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (the “say-on-pay proposal”). Our stockholders overwhelmingly approved the compensation of our named executive officers, with approximately 89% of stockholder votes cast in favor of the say-on-pay proposal. The Compensation Committee believes this affirms the stockholders’ support of our approach to executive compensation and did not change its approach in 2017.2019.

The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of our say-on-pay votes, such as Proposal Four in this proxy statement, when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.

Overview

We established an Office of the CEO currently consisting of Michael Arends, Ethan Caldwell and Russell C. Horowitz and subject to oversight by our Chairman, Anne Devereux-Mills. The Office of the CEO performs the duties and responsibilities of the CEO. Gary Nafus previously served as a member of the Office of the CEO until his resignation effective March 31, 2017.

Our “named executive officers”, or “NEOs”, are:

You can find detailed information regarding the compensation we paid to our NEOs in the tables that begin on page 19.18.

Our executive compensation programs are intended to serve two related goals:

We believe that this long-term focus will appropriately reward our management team for performance that will most benefit our Company and stockholders. We think that a focus on shorter-term results could inappropriately over- or under-compensate our executives due to short-term fluctuations that do not as accurately reflect our corporate growth and the corresponding benefit to our stockholders.

Our “long-term” emphasis results in NEO compensation packages that are weighted significantly towards long-term equity grants, with a relatively low proportion of NEO compensation derived from cash salaries. Annual cash bonuses to our NEOs are generally paid under our annual incentive plan, which ties such bonus payments directly to our annual corporate performance.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the compensation and benefits for our executive officers, to determine distributions and grants of awards under our various stock and other incentive plans and to assume responsibility for all matters related to the foregoing. Meetings of the Compensation Committee are called by the chair of the committee and the chair sets the agenda for

each committee meeting. In performing its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee typically invites, for all or a portion of each meeting, members of the Office of the CEOour Co-CEOs and other members of management to its meetings. Members of the Office of the CEOOur Co-CEOs meet with the Compensation Committee on an ongoing basis to discuss the objectives and performance of Marchex’s NEOs.other NEOs, if any. For compensation decisions relating to our executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers recommendations from members of the Office of the CEO,our Co-CEOs, who utilize various industry compensation surveys as part of our company wide annual compensation review process. After receipt and discussion of such recommendations with members of the Office of the CEO,our Co-CEOs, the Compensation Committee meets to ultimately determine the compensation packages for each of our executive officers. Members of the Office of the CEOOur Co-CEOs do not participate in deliberations regarding their individual compensation.

Role of a Compensation Consultant

The duties of any compensation consultant we may engage are generally to evaluate executive compensation, perform an analysis on realized pay alignment with financial and stock performance, discuss general compensation trends, provide competitive market practice data and benchmarking, participate in the design and implementation of certain elements of the executive compensation program and assist our chief executive officerCo-CEOs in developing compensation recommendations to present to the Compensation Committee for the executive officers other than himself.our Co-CEOs. The Compensation Committee may accept, reject or modify any recommendations by compensation consultants or other outside advisors. The compensation consultant does not make specific recommendations on individual amounts for the executive officers or the independent directors, nor does the consultant determine the amount or form of executive and director compensation.

In February 2016, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) as its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee conducted an assessment of Pearl Meyer’s independence relative to standards prescribed by the SEC and determined that no conflicts existed. Historically, the Company has not used a compensation consultant for executive compensation matters other than Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC in 2016 and the Company did not use a compensation consultant for the 20172018 and 2019 period.

NEO Compensation for 20172019

Our Compensation Committee in reviewing our executive compensation packages assesses salary, salary history, the number and value of shares owned by our executives, prior equity grants and vesting and exercise history. The Compensation Committee also considers data regarding compensation paid at public media, internet and technology-based companies of comparable size to our Company and which could compete for the services of our NEOs. Although the compensation practices of our competitors instruct our review, we use that data only to gain perspective and do not “benchmark” our compensation to any particular level. The Compensation Committee consults with outside counsel in its review and did not engage a compensation consultant in 2017, although the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer as its independent compensation consultant in 2016.

In August 2017, Mr. Horowitz transitioned from a consultant to the Company to Executive Director of the Board. For information regarding Mr. Horowitz’s base salary, equity grants, and other compensation in 2017, see page 17 under Consulting Agreement.

Competitive Positioning

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews competitive data regarding compensation at various comparable peer companies. We do not benchmark compensation levels to fall within specific ranges compared to selected peer groups in our industry. We use the information developed by management and outside counsel using proxy data for peer group companies to gain a general understanding of current compensation practices.

Base Salary

The 20172019 salaries shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 1918 were set by our Compensation Committee based on the compensation review discussed above, as well as a consideration of each NEO’s total compensation package including prior equity grants, exercise history, and existing stock ownership. Base salaries are a necessary part of our compensation program and provide executives with a fixed portion of pay that is not performance-based. Our goal is to provide competitive base pay levels. Historically, the Compensation Committee considered our desire to maintain cash remuneration as a relatively small portion of overall compensation. In addition, theThe Compensation Committee considered each NEO’s skills, experience, level of responsibility, performance and contribution to our Company. The Compensation Committee also took into account in conjunction with the NEO’s specific areas of responsibilities and objectives, each NEO’s contribution to the Company’s overall success as a member of the management team. The Compensation Committee considers the relative compensation levels among all the members of the management team to ensure the Company’s executive compensation programs are internally consistent and equitable. All salaries are reviewed at least annually and subject to future adjustment by the Compensation Committee. On June 15, 2017, the Compensation Committee, pursuant to its review of annual compensation for executive officers, approved annual NEO salaries effective June 16, 2017 of $297,500 for Mr. Arends and $292,500 for Mr. Caldwell.

Equity Compensation

All of our employees and directors are eligible to receive options, shares of restricted stock, and/or restricted stock units under our 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2012“2012 Stock Plan”Plan”).

The Compensation Committee does not automatically grant equity to NEOs every year. The Compensation Committee takes into account the various factors outlined in the discussion of base salary above as well as the Company’s financial performance and its impact on stockholder value and also analyzes existing NEO equity holdings and prior equity awards to take into account whether additional grants are appropriate and necessary to recalibrate the cash-equity balance of NEO compensation packages.

On June 15, 2017,April 17, 2019, the Compensation Committee granted our current NEOs (excluding Mr. Horowitz) stock options for our Class B common stock and shares of restricted stock to Mr. Arends under the 2012 Stock Plan (both with time-based vesting), based on the compensation review discussed above. The Compensation Committee determined the size of each NEO’sMr. Arends’ equity grantsgrant based on a consideration of his existing stock ownership and outstanding equity grants awarded in prior years. Given theirthe corresponding vesting schedules, we believe that thesethis equity grantsgrant will help further motivate our management teamMr. Arends to continue to focus on the long-term success of our business enterprise. You can find more information regarding these grants,this grant, including theirthe corresponding vesting schedules, by referring to our 2017 Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 20 and Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172019 Fiscal Year-End Table on page 21. Such equity awards are subject to double-trigger change in control acceleration in certain circumstances. For more information on this acceleration provision, refer to pages 22-25.19-20.  

Most equity awards for employees are tied to their annual performance reviews.reviews and are generally granted following the release of our fourth quarter financial results. We may occasionally make employee grants outside of that review process and such awards typically are granted as of the date the grant is approved. All new-hire awards have a grant date set to correspond to the date of hire. All options have an exercise price set at the closing market price of our Class B common stock on the grant date.

Annual Incentive Plan

The Compensation Committee originally adopted our annual incentive plan in 2006 and as amended to date (the “Incentive Plan”“Incentive Plan”) to motivate and reward key employees for enabling our Company to achieve specified corporate objectives together, to increase the competitiveness of our management compensation packages without increasing our fixed costs, and to align management compensation with key measures of our financial performance.

The Compensation Committee in its discretion determines the maximum amount available for award, in the aggregate, to all plan participants in light of the number of participants and the Company’s resources. The Compensation Committee also determines the participants in the pool. Eligibility determinations are based upon the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the importance of a participant’s role, together with such participant’s overall cash and equity compensation level. Finally, the Compensation Committee determines the measures of performance on which bonus awards are based, using any of the following as it determines in its sole discretion:

The Compensation Committee determined that for the 20172019 fiscal period, a maximum aggregate bonus pool of up to $731,250 (approximately 127% of the participants’ base salaries)$656,094 would be available for award in the aggregate, to all plan participants based upon the achievement of updated revenue (new revenue and total revenue) and adjusted OIBA targets at the highest threshold. The participants for the 20172019 fiscal period arewere Michael Arends and Ethan Caldwell.Russell Horowitz. The target bonus payout percentages are 50-100%were 25 to 175% based on the performance target category and arewere based on achieving specified revenue (new revenue and alltotal revenue) and adjusted OIBA targets for the 20172019 fiscal period. Bonus targets for 2017 are based on the following weighting: 0-25% from new revenueyear with each target attainment, 25-50% from all revenue target attainment and 50% from adjusted OIBA target attainment.category weighted 33 1/3%.

The Compensation Committee elected to use these revenues and adjusted OIBA targets because it believes that such targets most accurately reflect our growth and improvements in our corporate performance without the impact of certain non-cash and non-recurring expenses which the Company does not regard as ongoing costs of doing business. The Compensation Committee set a range of specific revenue and adjusted OIBA targets based on a review of our actual revenue and adjusted OIBA for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018 and our budgeted revenue and adjusted OIBA for the 20172019 fiscal year. At the low end of the range, the targets were intended to be difficult but realistic given our expectations regarding corporate performance. The high end of the range, intended to reflect “optimum” Company performance, were set in consideration of our projected financial results and were considered “stretch” goals.

The Compensation Committee also has absolute discretion to award no bonuses at all even if the highest target is achieved. It is our intention that any such bonus payments would still constitute a relatively small percentage of our NEO compensation so that the bulk of their compensation package will remain dependent on our long-term growth. For 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee awarded cash bonuses under the Incentive Plan in the amount of $278,438$182,545 to Mr. Horowitz and $358,380 to Mr. Arends. The Compensation Committee separately approved target cash bonus compensation for the second half of 2019 based upon the achievement of outperformance revenue and adjusted OIBA targets for Messrs. Arends and $277,617Horowitz, with a target bonus pool of $200,000 and a maximum outperformance bonus pool of $390,000 and target bonus payout percentages of up to Mr. Caldwell.

Cash Bonuses

In October 2016,195%. For 2019, the Compensation Committee separately awarded Mr. Nafus a cash bonusbonuses in the amount of $196,875 which was paid in October of 2016 and $65,625 which was paid in January of 2017 for 2016 performance of which $100,000 was subject to forfeiture upon certain events. In addition, Mr. Nafus was also to receive a guaranteed minimum cash bonus payment of $175,000 ($43,750 per quarter) assuming continued employment at each such quarterly date. Mr. Nafus resigned as our Chief Revenue Officer and as a member of the Office of the CEO effective March 31, 2017 and in connection with his employment termination, $100,000 of the 2016 performance bonus paid was forfeited. Mr. Nafus was paid $43,750 of the guaranteed minimum cash bonus for the first quarter of 2017. The Compensation Committee separately awarded Mr. Arends a cash bonus in the amount of $150,000 subject to Marchex achieving certain positive adjusted EBITDA thresholds sooner than provided for in the Corporation’s 2017 budget and which was paid in 2017.  

On August 21, 2017, the Compensation Committee separately approved the following performance cash bonus parameters applicable to Mr. Horowitz: performance cash bonuses subject to the execution of certain customer or partner contracts with each contract exceeding certain annualized minimum contract values and assuming continued employment at each such payment date (a) in the amount of $250,000 (the “First Performance Payment”)  if such conditions are met on or before December 31, 2017, and (b) additional incremental performance cash bonuses in two tranches of $125,000 each, if such incremental performance conditions are met for one or both tranches on or before August 31, 2018. The First Performance Payment parameters were met and such amount was paid$136,500 to Mr. Horowitz in 2017.

Amended and Restated Executive Officer Employment Agreements

Effective on April 21, 2016, pursuant$253,500 to the Compensation Committee’s review of long-term incentives and annual compensation for executive officers, we entered into Amended and Restated Executive Officer Employment Agreements with each of Messrs. MichaelMr. Arends Ethan Caldwell and Gary Nafus and which such agreements supersede any prior employment related agreements or offer letters, the terms of which are described in more detail under the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 22.thereunder.

Retention Agreements

We have entered into retention agreements with each of Messrs. Arends and Caldwell. In addition, the majority of our outstanding equity grants held by our executive officers will vest in full immediately upon any change in control. These arrangements are described on page 24.

We believe it is appropriate to have these arrangements in place to promote our goal of the long-term retention of our management team. The Compensation Committee took into account the retention practices of our competitors in establishing the terms of such retention agreements.

Consulting Agreement

On May 11, 2016, we entered into an agreement with Mr. Horowitz which provides from May 12, 2016 through the earlier of (i) May 12, 2017, or (ii) Marchex’s termination of the consulting period, Mr. Horowitz will provide consulting and advisory services from time to time and Marchex will pay Mr. Horowitz an annualized amount of $255,000 per year, payable in monthly installments in advance through May 12, 2017 for such services (the “Horowitz Agreement”).

On May 12, 2017, the Horowitz Agreement was amended to provide for the continuation of the consulting relationship beyond the original termination date of May 12, 2017 on a month to month basis and on August 21, 2017, Mr. Horowitz was appointed Executive Director of the Board and in connection therewith, we acknowledged termination of Mr. Horowitz’s consulting arrangement. 

In connection with Mr. Horowitz’s appointment as Executive Director of the Board effective on August 21, 2017, Marchex’s Compensation Committee (i) approved a replacement annual salary of $255,000 for Mr. Horowitz and acknowledged the termination of his consulting arrangement in connection with such appointment, and (ii) awarded Mr. Horowitz a restricted stock grant under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan to purchase 145,000 shares of Marchex’s Class B common stock, and 95,000 options, with 100% of such shares and options vesting on the third annual anniversary of the grant date assuming continued service as Executive Director on the vesting date with Double-Trigger Change in Control Acceleration and with accelerated vesting in full upon death or disability.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices

We believe our compensation policies and practices do not motivatepromote imprudent risk taking. In this regard, we note the following: (i) our annual incentive compensation is based on balanced performance metrics that promote disciplined progress towards longer-term Company goals; (ii) we do not offer short-term incentives that might drive high-risk investments at the expense of long-term Company value; and (iii) our compensation programs are weighted towards offering long-term incentives that reward sustainable performance, especially when considering our executive share ownership. Accordingly, we believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically request that it be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The Compensation Committee consists of Dennis Cline (Chair), Anne Devereux-Mills and M. Wayne Wisehart. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with our management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Respectfully submitted,

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Dennis Cline, Chair

Anne Devereux-Mills

M. Wayne Wisehart

Summary Compensation Table ⁽¹⁾

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20162018 and 2017,2019, as applicable, by our NEOs:

Pay Ratio Disclosure

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Ethan Caldwell, our General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer, member of the Office of the CEO and designated principal executive officer (“PEO”) for SEC reporting purposes as we do not have a CEO at this time. To identify the “median employee” we reviewed total compensation of all full-time, part-time, and temporary employees employed by us on December 31, 2017 excluding our designated PEO. Total compensation for purposes of identifying the median employee included the following: (1) base salary paid in 2017 with new hire salaries in 2017 annualized; (2) cash bonus or sales commission earned in 2017; and (3) the grant date fair value of equity awards granted in 2017. We then calculated the annual total compensation for this median employee using the same methodology we used for our NEOs in our 2017 Summary Compensation Table. As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 19, the annual total compensation of our designated PEO was $919,280. The annual total compensation of our median employee was $111,462. Our estimated designated PEO to median employee pay ratio for 2017 is 8:1. We believe this ratio to be a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. The pay ratio disclosure rules of Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K provide significant flexibility regarding the methodology used to identify the median employee and calculate the median employee’s annual total compensation. Our methodology may differ materially from the methodology used by other companies to prepare their pay ratio disclosures. Moreover, differences in employee populations, geographic locations, business strategies and compensation practices may contribute to a lack of comparability between our pay ratio and the pay ratio reported by other companies, including those within our industry.

2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards ⁽¹⁾

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to plan-based awards and other awards granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 to our NEOs:

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172019 Fiscal Year-End ⁽¹⁾

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the value of all unexercised options and unvested stock awards previously awarded to our NEOs as of December 31, 2017.2019. Certain option and stock awards provide for accelerated vesting, in full upon a change in control.certain circumstances. For more information on these acceleration provisions, please refer to pages 22-25.Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control at page 20.